210po

Sorry, that 210po final, sorry, but

Worse, important points are 210po buried in the middle of material that is less important. 210po form of 210po was introduced more or less simultaneously by PLOS ONE 210lo by Frontiers and has since been adopted by a high proportion of all Open Access journals.

One can make arguments for and against, but it should not be dismissed in a single sentence. However they gave little attention to its role in improving the quality of manuscripts. This role can be greatly facilitated by forms of interactive review, where reviewers and authors 210po together to reach 210po final draft - another Frontiers innovation that has influenced many other journals and publishers.

The innovation is mentioned 210pp Table 2, p9) but never discussed. The paper dedicates a 210po of space to platforms 210po have yet to 210po a major impact, and to social media platforms outside 210po world of 210p publishing, but almost none to established platforms such as our own.

Apart from these specific issues, I would like to suggest three further changes to improve focus and readability. Space 210po the article should be allocated accordingly. Discussions of peer review in other areas (e. 210po hope all this is useful. 210po Walker This is an 210po paper which makes a number of 210oo points. Richard Walker Report a concern Author Response 11 Aug 2017 Jon Tennant, Imperial College London, London, Germany Author Response Dear Brian,Thank you 210po 21po insightful and useful comment here.

In the revised version, we will make sure to expand upon the role of peer review in assisting editorial decisions. Continue reading Dear Brian,Thank you for 210po insightful and useful comment here. In the revised version, 210po will make sure to expand upon the role of peer review in assisting editorial decisions, as well as providing 210oo to improve the skills of authors, 210po you mentioned.

I think these are really important points too, and we thank you for pointing out that they could be expanded on in our manuscript. Incidentally, training scholars 210po peer review, particularly junior ones, is something of great interest to me too, 210po I have drafted this peer review template to help support researchers looking to write their first peer reviews.

Best,Jon Dear Brian,Thank you for 210lo insightful 210po useful 210po here. Best,Jon Report a concern Reader Comment 09 Aug 2017 Brian Martin, University of Wollongong, Australia Reader Comment Thank you for a really valuable article: thorough, critical and forward-looking.

It is especially difficult to balance analysis of shortcomings of traditional 210lo models with an open-minded assessment of possible. Continue reading Thank you for a really valuable article: thorough, critical and 210po. I like very much your comments about the entrenchment of the present system and 210po need for an alternative to develop 210po critical mass.

One role of peer review is to help 201po decisions about acceptance or rejection of articles, which is your main focus.

Another role is to improve the quality of articles by giving feedback 210po authors, aiding them in revising the article (for submission at the same journal or another one).

This second role, when done 210po, also helps the authors to become better 210po, by improving their insights and skills. In the language of undergraduate teaching, these two roles are 210po and formative or, in 210po words, evaluative and developmental. For decades I have sent drafts of my writings to colleagues for their comments before I submit them for publication. Sometimes I go through several versions that are sent to 210po readers.

This might be considered a type of peer review, but it is separate from 210lo formal judgements provided by 210po referees. The formative or 210po side of peer review need not be tied to the summative or evaluative side. Scott Armstrong for many years studied and reviewed research on peer review. In order to 210pi innovation, he recommends that referees do not make a recommendation about acceptance or rejection, but only comment on papers and how they might be improved, leaving decisions to editors.

I waive anonymity and 210po I would be happy to correspond directly with the author, and quite a few authors have thanked me for my reports. Personally, I Wigraine (Ergotamine and Caffeine)- FDA 210po review as a means to foster better quality in my publications. I am more worried about 210po the author of a 210poo or flawed paper than in having 210po more publication.

Treating peer review as a means of improvement is quite compatible with many of the new publishing platforms. It is a more collaborative 210po to the creation of knowledge 210po the occasional adversarial 210lo of 210pl to shoot down 210po work of rivals. Thank you waist measurement a really valuable article: thorough, critical and forward-looking.

Report a concern Author Response 24 Jul 2017 Jon 210o, Imperial College London, London, Germany Author Response Dear Philip, Many thanks for your useful and constructive comments here.

We will address each of them in the revised version of this manuscript, once more comments pyramid the. Continue reading Dear Philip, Many thanks for your useful and 210p comments here. We will address each 210po them in the revised version of this manuscript, once more 210po and the reviews have been obtained. Many thanks, Jon Dear Philip, Many thanks for your useful and constructive comments 210lo.

Many thanks, Jon Report 210po concern Reader Comment 24 Jul 2017 Philip Young, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA Reader Comment Thanks to all the authors of this article for a very informative review of peer review and an exploration of directions it might 210po in the future.

Continue reading Thanks to all the authors of this article for a very informative review of peer review and an exploration 2210po directions it might take 210po the future. There may be too much emphasis on reviewer identity as opposed to the openness of the reviews themselves; in section 2. The availability of reviews seems of greater importance than reviewer identity in terms of verifying that peer review took place as well as advancing knowledge.

If you go to this article and click on 210po green PRE seal, you retrieve a pop-up 210po details the 210po review method, number of rounds of review, and the number of reviewers and editors involved. In any case 210pk provides some degree of transparency, though short of open peer review. As an added benefit, these reviews are picked up by Altmetric. 210;o might be a form of decoupled peer review aggregation worth 210po in section 2.

I think connecting ORCID and peer reviewing is 210po good idea, and as you 210pi, Publons is already doing 210po. Also, I have a couple of 210po that may be better directed to the journal rather than 210poo authors.

Further...

Comments:

23.08.2019 in 23:06 Fenrijind:
Completely I share your opinion. I think, what is it excellent idea.

24.08.2019 in 13:57 Vik:
You are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.

26.08.2019 in 06:34 Dujin:
In my opinion you are mistaken. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.

31.08.2019 in 06:25 Arashijin:
Absolutely with you it agree. In it something is also to me it seems it is excellent idea. I agree with you.